QS Arena
503601909Analyzed2v2 RM
·
1mo ago on Sep 1, 2026·
81m 3s·
4 players
Game mode
Random Map
Map size
Medium (4 player)
Population
200
Speed
Normal
Resources
Standard
Victory
Conquest
Starting age
Dark Age
Ending age
Imperial Age
RankedLock teamsTeams togetherTeam positionsShared explorationLock speedFull tech treeHidden civsTurbo modeCheats
Victory
Defeat
Replay analysis
Compared against 6,820 analysed team-game players on QS Arena.
fernando_delgado12
C
Feudal Age
8:18
vs 8:33
top 37%
Castle Age
16:35
vs 13:39
btm 21%
Imperial Age
32:21
vs 29:54
btm 31%
eAPM
22
vs 26
btm 34%
First military
16:05
vs 16:14
top 49%
▼
Slow Castle Age at 16:35 — slower than 79% of analysed players on QS Arena
▼
Loom after the Feudal click (9:33) — usually safest before it
▲
Town centers almost never idle — 1s across the first 16:35
Robert Grigoryan
D
Feudal Age
9:04
vs 8:33
btm 30%
Castle Age
18:30
vs 13:39
btm 12%
Imperial Age
36:27
vs 29:54
btm 11%
eAPM
28
vs 26
top 44%
First military
20:25
vs 16:14
btm 24%
▼
Slow Castle Age at 18:30 — slower than 88% of analysed players on QS Arena
▼
Slow Imperial Age at 36:27 — slower than 89% of analysed players on QS Arena
▲
Town centers almost never idle — 2s across the first 18:30
Rumyumy
C
Feudal Age
7:29
vs 8:33
top 10%
Castle Age
16:28
vs 13:39
btm 22%
Imperial Age
36:29
vs 29:54
btm 11%
eAPM
21
vs 26
btm 31%
First military
16:24
vs 16:14
btm 49%
▲
Fast Feudal Age at 7:29 — faster than 90% of analysed players on QS Arena
▼
Slow Castle Age at 16:28 — slower than 78% of analysed players on QS Arena
▼
Slow Imperial Age at 36:29 — slower than 89% of analysed players on QS Arena
▼
Loom never researched — one lost villager costs more
Canaria
D
Feudal Age
10:13
vs 8:33
btm 8%
Castle Age
19:02
vs 13:39
btm 11%
Imperial Age
39:08
vs 29:54
btm 6%
eAPM
18
vs 26
btm 22%
First military
22:46
vs 16:14
btm 17%
▼
Slow Feudal Age at 10:13 — slower than 92% of analysed players on QS Arena
▼
Slow Castle Age at 19:02 — slower than 89% of analysed players on QS Arena
▼
Slow Imperial Age at 39:08 — slower than 94% of analysed players on QS Arena
▼
Low eAPM (18) — busier hands win idle time back