Highland

504337269Analyzed

4v4 RM · 27d ago on Sep 4, 2026· 1m 2s· 8 players

Game mode

Random Map

Map size

Large (8 player)

Population

200

Speed

Normal

Resources

Standard

Victory

Conquest

Starting age

Dark Age

Ending age

Imperial Age

RankedLock teamsTeams togetherTeam positionsShared explorationLock speedFull tech treeHidden civsTurbo modeCheats

Victory

Defeat

billyraza786

🇵🇰 Turks · Pakistan

778

+17

Omeireles

🇬🇧 Khmer · United Kingdom

712

+20

iakhan

🇬🇧 Bulgarians · United Kingdom

709

+20

Super.Adz

🇬🇧 Franks · United Kingdom

688

+21

simon

🇨🇳 Italians · China

852

-22

Hydarnis

🇺🇸 Cumans · United States

817

-20

primeyy1997

🇳🇱 Mongols · Netherlands

770

-18

BasicOrc4106

🇺🇸 Gurjaras · United States

769

-25

Replay analysis

Compared against 47,594 analysed team-game players on Highland.

BasicOrc4106 A

Feudal Age — vs 11:25

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 20:15

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:20

btm 0%

eAPM 32 vs 25

top 31%

primeyy1997 C

Feudal Age — vs 11:25

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 20:15

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:20

btm 0%

eAPM 19 vs 25

btm 31%

Hydarnis D

Feudal Age — vs 11:25

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 20:15

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:20

btm 0%

eAPM 15 vs 25

btm 17%

▼ Low eAPM (15) — busier hands win idle time back

simon D

Feudal Age — vs 11:25

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 20:15

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:20

btm 0%

eAPM 8 vs 25

btm 3%

▼ Low eAPM (8) — busier hands win idle time back

iakhan D

Feudal Age — vs 11:25

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 20:15

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:20

btm 0%

eAPM 13 vs 25

btm 12%

▼ Low eAPM (13) — busier hands win idle time back

Omeireles A

Feudal Age — vs 11:25

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 20:15

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:20

btm 0%

eAPM 33 vs 25

top 30%

billyraza786 C

Feudal Age — vs 11:25

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 20:15

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:20

btm 0%

eAPM 23 vs 25

btm 44%

Super.Adz S

Feudal Age — vs 11:25

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 20:15

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:20

btm 0%

eAPM 38 vs 25

top 20%

▲ High eAPM (38) — top quarter of analysed players