Pilgrims

507523944Analyzed

3v3 RM · 13d ago on Sep 18, 2026· 0m 43s· 6 players

Game mode

Random Map

Map size

Normal (6 player)

Population

200

Speed

Normal

Resources

Standard

Victory

Conquest

Starting age

Dark Age

Ending age

Imperial Age

RankedLock teamsTeams togetherTeam positionsShared explorationLock speedFull tech treeHidden civsTurbo modeCheats

Victory

Defeat

TwBestShaco

🇹🇼 Berbers · Taiwan

1436

+13

NPChinh

🇻🇳 Italians · Vietnam

1432

+13

Russell Edgington

🇬🇧 Teutons · United Kingdom

1394

+14

HURMA

🇧🇾 Huns · Belarus

1371

-13

NiL

🇺🇦 Saracens · Ukraine

1371

-14

So sad

🇧🇾 Magyars · Belarus

1342

-13

Replay analysis

Compared against 60,534 analysed team-game players on Pilgrims.

Russell Edgington S

Feudal Age — vs 12:02

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 19:26

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:19

btm 0%

eAPM 35 vs 26

top 25%

▲ High eAPM (35) — top quarter of analysed players

NPChinh S

Feudal Age — vs 12:02

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 19:26

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:19

btm 0%

eAPM 56 vs 26

top 3%

▲ High eAPM (56) — top quarter of analysed players

TwBestShaco D

Feudal Age — vs 12:02

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 19:26

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:19

btm 0%

eAPM 13 vs 26

btm 12%

▼ Low eAPM (13) — busier hands win idle time back

NiL D

Feudal Age — vs 12:02

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 19:26

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:19

btm 0%

eAPM 15 vs 26

btm 17%

▼ Low eAPM (15) — busier hands win idle time back

HURMA D

Feudal Age — vs 12:02

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 19:26

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:19

btm 0%

eAPM 4 vs 26

btm 2%

▼ Low eAPM (4) — busier hands win idle time back

So sad D

Feudal Age — vs 12:02

btm 0%

Castle Age — vs 19:26

btm 0%

Imperial Age — vs 36:19

btm 0%

eAPM 14 vs 26

btm 16%

▼ Low eAPM (14) — busier hands win idle time back